Only Allah Is Eternal

Read in Other Languages
Loading…

Only Allah Is Eternal

M. Fethullah Gülen · Sermon · February 21, 1975 · Muradiye Mosque, Manisa · Second sermon of the "Proofs of Tawhid" series

Last week Hocaefendi described the diseases that stand in the way of guidance. In this sermon he briefly recalls them and moves on to the main subject: the four universal proofs that bear witness to Allah's existence and oneness, and the first of them, the proof of hudus (coming-into-being). The law of heat, the electrons revolving around the atom, and the mass the sun loses every second all point to the same thing: matter is not without beginning; only Allah is eternal. The sermon ends with the answer to the question "Who created Allah?", given through the examples of the book, the preacher, the feet, and the train wagons.

This post follows the video above section by section. The main text is what the preacher says. Scientific explanations, present-day values of the 1975 figures, corrections, logical reviews of the examples, alternative proofs from present-day science, Risale-i Nur parallels, and source notes are in the expandable boxes; these are not the preacher's words. The opening prayers at the start of the recording and the closing prayer at the end are not included in the video; they are given in boxes in this post.

🤲 Opening prayers and An-Nur 24:35 (not included in the video)

The audio recording opens in Arabic: the isti'adha, the basmala, praise of Allah, and blessings on the Prophet. Then the following verses and prayers are recited (verses in Suat Yıldırım's translation):

"Glory be to You, O Lord! What can we know other than what You have taught us? It is You who know all things fully, You who do all things with wisdom." (Al-Baqarah 2:32). Right after it comes a prayer in the same mold: Subhanaka la fahma lana illa ma fahhamtana, innaka anta'l-Jawadu'l-Karim (We declare You free of all imperfection; we have no understanding except what You have made us understand; You are the All-Generous, the Most Noble).

The prayer of Moses: "'My Lord,' he said, 'expand my breast, ease my task, and loosen the knot of my tongue, so that they may understand my words!'" (Ta-Ha 20:25-28) and "So I entrust my affair to Allah." (Ghafir 40:44). Then blessings on the Prophet, recited as many times as the number of His creatures, as much as pleases Allah, as much as the weight of His Throne, and as much as the ink of His words (these expressions come from the hadith of Juwayriya, Muslim).

With the basmala, verse 35 of Surah An-Nur: "Allah is the light of the heavens and the earth (it is He who illuminates them). The likeness of His light is like a niche in which there is a lamp. The lamp is in a crystal (glass), and the crystal is as if it were a shining, pearl-like star! This lamp is lit from a blessed, most bountiful olive tree, belonging neither to the east alone nor to the west alone. So blessed is this tree that its oil would almost give light even if no fire touched it. Its light is radiant. Allah guides to His light whomever He wills, and sets forth such parables for people so that they may grasp the truth. Allah knows all things." (An-Nur 24:35)

Hocaefendi's prayer in Turkish: "Ya Ilaha'l-'alamin (O You whom all the worlds worship)! ... Make Your divine success our companion; keep us innocent and safe from the evil of the self, of Satan, and of whims. Grant us all success in living along the line of the Qur'an, miraculous in its eloquence, and honor us with the honor of serving the Qur'an. Let knowledge of You flow into our hearts. Bring our hearts to rest with the light of knowledge of You. Honor us all, in this spirit, this understanding, this inner assurance, with Paradise and with the honor of beholding Allah's Beauty. Amin, for the sake of the master of the messengers."

I — Diseases that block guidance

The truth cannot be told to an arrogant heart

Before beginning the lessons in which he will explain Allah through His Attributes and His Names, Hocaefendi recalls the previous week's lesson: "Ignorance is a cause that drives a person toward unbelief. Heedlessness is a cause that drives a person toward unbelief. Boasting and arrogance are a cause that drives a person toward unbelief. Whims and deviation are a cause that drives a person toward unbelief, we said." To settle like a bee upon every tree Allah has planted and to return to the heart with beams of knowledge of Allah depends on casting these diseases out of the heart.

"If a heart is filled with arrogance, if it is boastful, then even if the Messenger of Allah came to it, even if Prophet Moses came and told it the truth and reality, it would stand against him as a Pharaoh, it would be an Abu Jahl; it would not listen to the truth." That the truth goes unheard can be ascribed neither to the truth being illogical nor to the shortcomings of the one explaining it: "The truth is always mighty and always precious." In many eras the real obstacle has been that hearts were filled with arrogance and pride. That is why the one who explains the truth will not give it up, and will not fall into despair even when it is not accepted. And the one who listens, yet in whose heart no beam of light arises, should cast out the arrogance in his heart before saying "This did not satisfy me": "This is Allah's law."

📋 Four causes that drive toward unbelief
IgnoranceNot knowing; being unable to read the proofs in the universe.
HeedlessnessEvaluating events backwards; passing them by.
ArroganceThe disease of self-admiration; it throws the proofs back in your face.
Whims and deviationFollowing the desires of the self and straying from the path.

II — Al-A'raf 7:146

Arrogance veils the eye

Hocaefendi recites verse 146 of Surah Al-A'raf. In Suat Yıldırım's translation: "Those who unjustly act arrogantly on earth, I will turn away from properly understanding My signs. Even if those arrogant ones were to see every kind of miracle, they still would not believe in them. If they see the right path, they do not take it. But if they see the path of error, they take that path. So it is! For they have made it their habit to deny Our signs and have kept on being heedless of them." (Al-A'raf 7:146)

As the preacher explains it: the verses Allah has written in the heavens and on earth, the signs that point to His existence, He makes a veil over the eyes of the arrogant. "Were the universe all verses, thundering 'Allah!', were human nature to say 'Allah!', they still would not believe." Seeing the right path, they do not take it; but show them a path belonging to Satan, and they embrace it at once. The meaning drawn from the spirit of the verse is this: "If there is the disease of self-admiration, of arrogance, in a person's heart, however many proofs you bring him, the proofs you bring will be turned upside down and thrown back in your face, and not the slightest beam of knowledge, not a drop of knowledge of Allah, will form in his heart."

III — Wrongdoing and lying

There will be Abu Jahls, and there will be Abu Bakrs

Those who veer into wrongdoing and lying, that is, those who violate the rights of others and the rights of Allah, who lie against the universe and against their own selves, who live a double life, are likewise deprived of guidance. The preacher recites two verses; in Suat Yıldırım's translation: "...Allah does not guide the wrongdoers, nor bring them to their hopes." (Al-Baqarah 2:258) and "...Allah does not guide those who have made lying, ingratitude and unbelief their habit, nor bring them to their hopes." (Az-Zumar 39:3). In the preacher's words: "Allah guides whoever seeks it. But the wrongdoer has lost his right to guidance."

Lying has its kinds: lying against the universe by denying Allah, the lie of clinging to suppositions and hypotheses, the lie of not approaching the truth, the lie of always fleeing from one's own heart. "To a person of this nature, even if you offer faith like the water of life, as a sweet drink, he will throw it back in your face as poison." Still, there is no despair: "There will be Abu Jahls, and there will be Abu Bakrs too. But without falling into despair, asking for the help of the Almighty, we will keep on explaining."

📋 Kinds of lying
Against the universeDenying Allah and making the universe speak lies on one's own behalf.
In thoughtClinging to suppositions and hypotheses; not approaching the truth.
Against the selfRemaining a stranger to one's own nature; always fleeing from one's own heart.
📖 In the Risale-i Nur · Wrongdoing and lying

Bediüzzaman, too, mentions these two names together with the mystery of the test: "If it were utterly self-evident, the mind would have no choice left; Abu Jahl too would affirm it just as Abu Bakr did, the test and moral responsibility would lose their point, and coal and diamond would remain on the same level." (The Letters, Nineteenth Letter, Fourth Sign, with its subtle point). That the truth is not accepted by everyone is a requirement of the test; the preacher's advice not to fall into despair accords with this mystery.

📖 Source note · Wrongdoing and lying

The phrase "Wallahu la yahdi'l-qawma'z-zalimin" (Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people) occurs not only in Al-Baqarah 2:258 but also in Al 'Imran 3:86, At-Tawbah 9:19, As-Saff 61:7 and Al-Jumu'ah 62:5.

IV — Heedlessness

Standing, sitting, lying down

Heedlessness makes a person evaluate events backwards; it keeps him from seeing their true nature and meaning. That is why the Qur'an spreads events before a person like a book and invites him to reflection. The preacher recites verses 190-191 of Surah Al 'Imran. In Suat Yıldırım's translation: "Surely in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and in night and day following one another as their lengths grow longer and shorter, there are indeed many proofs for people who think. They are those who remember Allah now standing at attention, now sitting, now lying on their sides, who reflect on the creation of the heavens and the earth and say: 'Our Exalted Lord! You did not create these without purpose, in vain. We declare You free of such deficiencies. Protect us from the punishment of that Fire!'" (Al 'Imran 3:190-191)

As the preacher explains it: standing and walking about, the believers search for proofs of Allah behind every event they come across; sitting, they say, "It is Allah who seats me. It is Allah who created these joints fit for sitting"; lying down, they reflect on rest. In the end they say, "Everything is brimming, filled with wisdom." "But the one in heedlessness understands neither the meaning of lying down nor the meaning of rising, nor the meaning of walking about." Surah Yusuf describes the same state; in Suat Yıldırım's translation: "How many proofs there are in the heavens and on the earth showing Allah's existence, oneness and power, which people pass by without noticing, because they turn their faces away!" (Yusuf 12:105). As the moon moves, as the sun rises, as the grass turns green, as the birds sing like nightingales, "everything says 'Allah,' says, 'Let me tell you about Allah.' Yet he passes by all of this, he turns his gaze away from all these signs."

📋 Three states in the verse
StandingAs he walks about, he searches for a proof of Allah behind every event.
SittingHe remembers the One who made the joints fit for sitting.
On their sidesLying down, he reflects on rest and remembers Allah.

V — Sin and the rust on the heart

Sin rusts the heart

Plunging into sin, being unable to hold oneself back from disobedience, is also an obstacle to guidance. According to the preacher, because the unbelievers discovered this subtle point, they prepared the ground for people to sin, and in particular stirred up the excitement and passions of the young. The preacher recites two verses; in Suat Yıldırım's translation: "Thus do We insert that denial and mockery into the hearts of the guilty. Though the calamities that befell past communities stand as a lesson, they still do not believe." (Al-Hijr 15:12-13) and "No! The truth is not so! The evil deeds they kept doing have gradually rusted their hearts." (Al-Mutaffifin 83:14)

As the preacher explains it: "Because of what they have earned, there are wounds and bruises in their hearts, there is rust; when the truth comes, it will find no echo, it will not be well received; Allah will be explained, but there will be no opening of the heart, no shiver, in him." In an age when opportunities for sin are spread out in the streets, Hocaefendi calls on the congregation to raise their hands and pray: "May He make our hearts ready to understand the truths of faith and the Qur'an."

📖 In the Risale-i Nur · Sin and the rust on the heart

"Indeed, sin penetrates the heart and, blackening it more and more, hardens it until the light of faith is driven out. Within every sin there is a road leading to unbelief." (The Flashes, Second Flash, First Point). The same Point ends with the mystery of "bal rana 'ala qulubihim" (their hearts are covered with rust) in Al-Mutaffifin 83:14 being understood.

VI — Four universal proofs

The universe, the Qur'an, the Prophet, conscience

Before moving on to the main subject, Hocaefendi adds a note: since the matter, rather than stirring feeling and excitement, "appeals entirely to the mind and the heart," it may weigh heavily on the listeners. But: "Everywhere Allah is making Himself known." With everything, from the ear being placed here and the nose there, to the face of the sky being studded with stars and the earth being adorned with trees and grasses. "So the greatest truth in the universe is Allah being made known, and the greatest truth for human beings is their understanding Allah."

To explain all these proofs would take years: "Because every event is a book in itself." Hocaefendi lists four of the universal proofs. The first: "What tells us about Allah is the book of the universe, which Allah wrote by His power and will and set before our eyes and our sight." The second witness is the Qur'an, the translation and interpreter of that book; the third witness is Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), the interpreter of that interpreter, for whose sake the universe was created; and the fourth witness is conscience, "which does not deceive or mislead a person, which, even when he is in misguidance, makes him say 'forever, forever.'"

📋 Four witnesses
The universeThe book Allah wrote by His power and will.
The Qur'anThe translation and interpreter of the book of the universe.
Prophet MuhammadThe interpreter of the interpreter; together with the other prophets and their miracles.
ConscienceIt does not deceive or mislead; it is content with nothing other than eternity.
📖 In the Risale-i Nur · Four universal proofs

"There are three great, universal guides that make our Lord known to us: one is this book of the universe ... one is the Seal of the Prophets (peace and blessings be upon him), the supreme sign of this great book. And one is the Qur'an of Mighty Stature." (The Words, Nineteenth Word, First Droplet). On the Qur'an as the interpreter of the book of the universe: the Qur'an is "a pre-eternal translation of this great book of the universe" and "the eternal interpreter of its various tongues that recite the signs of creation" (The Words, Twenty-Fifth Word). The preacher adds conscience to these three guides as a fourth witness. The counterpart of the "greatest truth" sentence: "the highest aim of creation and the most sublime result of human nature is belief in Allah. And the most exalted rank of humanity and the greatest station of mankind is the knowledge of Allah contained within belief in Allah." (The Letters, Twentieth Letter, Introduction).

VII — The horizons and the self

"True, just as your speaking is true"

The preacher recites from Surah Adh-Dhariyat. In Suat Yıldırım's translation: "On the earth there are many proofs for those who seek certain belief. And in your own selves there are such proofs too. Will you still not see? And in the heaven are both your provision (the means of your provision) and the Paradise you are promised." (Adh-Dhariyat 51:20-22). And he asks: "Have you never looked at your face in front of a mirror? Have you never thought about your own nature?" "In a single verse, a connection is established between the great world and the small world." Provision too comes from the sky: the evaporation of the seas, the falling of the rain, the blowing of the wind come about by Allah's command; and the promised Paradise is also in the heaven.

Then comes the verse of the oath; in Suat Yıldırım's translation: "By the Lord of the heaven and the earth, this promise is a truth, just as certain as the fact that you speak." (Adh-Dhariyat 51:23). Here Hocaefendi states his own understanding: "Perhaps the commentator did not grasp this. But I understand this meaning." Just as you speak, the universe too, with its signs, with its trees, leaves, fruits and seeds, tells about Allah: "Between that speech and this speech there is essentially no difference. This one addresses the ear. That one addresses the eye. If both are evaluated under the arbitration of the mind, the conclusion to be drawn in the laboratory of the heart will be the truth that Allah is the Creator, that Allah is One."

📖 In the Risale-i Nur · The horizons and the self

For the window opened by Adh-Dhariyat 51:20-21, Bediüzzaman says: "This Window is the window of man, and it is inward." (The Words, Thirty-Third Word, Thirty-First Window). On the connection between the great and the small world: "this macrocosm called the universe, and the microcosm called man, its miniature model, display the outward and inward proofs of divine unity written by the pen of power and destiny." (The Letters, Twentieth Letter, Fourth Phrase).

📖 Source note · The horizons and the self

Reading Adh-Dhariyat 51:23 as the "speech" of the universe is, as the preacher himself points out, his own interpretation; in the commentaries the verse is understood to mean that the promise given is as certain as the fact that you speak.

VIII — The Qur'an and the prophets

So that they have no argument left

That the Qur'an is a proof, again the Qur'an makes us see. In Suat Yıldırım's translation: "Is it not enough for them that We have sent down this Book, which is recited to them? Surely in it there is a mercy and a sufficient reminder for people who believe." (Al-'Ankabut 29:51). "It is impossible for such a thing to come from one who was unlettered." Whichever verse they probe, by its manner of expression, its eloquence, its telling of the unseen, its perfect description of the universe, its explanation of the riddle of humanity, it becomes clear that "it cannot be the book of an unlettered man who lived fourteen centuries ago"; it is the Word of the Creator of the heavens and the earth.

All the prophets, and especially our Prophet, are decisive witnesses to Allah's existence and oneness. In Suat Yıldırım's translation: "We sent those messengers as bearers of the good news of Our mercy and as warners of Our punishment, so that, after the messengers, people would have no excuse left to put forward against Allah..." (An-Nisa 4:165). The prophets told that the right path leads to Paradise and the crooked path to Hell, so that before Allah people "cannot say, 'We could not see, we could not know.'" The last verse turns our gaze to the fourth proof, conscience: "Otherwise, should they not have pondered the Qur'an? Or are there locks upon locks over their hearts?" (Muhammad 47:24, Suat Yıldırım's translation). Hocaefendi leaves the explanation of these proofs to the coming Fridays.

IX — The proof of hudus

Encompassed by His Attributes, known through His Names, unknown in His Essence

The first of the proofs concerning the universe is the proof of hudus, "or in more modern language, the proof of coming-into-being." Coming-into-being shows one of Allah's Attributes; the universe having been created adorned and embellished shows another; its continuing and its perishing show yet another. That is why one must also consider to which Attribute and which Name each proof refers. Allah's Essence, however, cannot be comprehended: "The inability to comprehend Allah is the greatest comprehension. It begins with Abu Bakr." "The Creator's Essence can never be understood." Sound knowledge about the Attributes and Names means a sound conviction about Allah.

Why such a weighty matter? "But the believer is obliged to seal every hole through which Satan would slip doubt into the heart, every window through which doubt might come." For "you may be a delusion, the universe may be a delusion. But the Essence of the Creator cannot be." One of the breaches is the claim of those who worship causes: the atom turns into energy, energy into the atom, and this goes on forever as a perpetual cycle. In this way "what should be given to Allah they hand out to causes, they divide it up." Hocaefendi says he will present the matter in popular terms suited to the congregation, and asks the specialists to bear with him.

📋 How is Allah known?
His EssenceIt cannot be comprehended; the inability to comprehend is the greatest comprehension.
His AttributesThey surround the Essence on every side; we look at them in a halting, patchy way, because of their shadows within our own nature.
His NamesThe universe is the manifestation of the Names; we strive to know them fully.
📖 In the Risale-i Nur · The proof of hudus

For the way of hudus and contingency, Bediüzzaman says: "This Window is the window of all the theologians, founded on contingency and hudus, and it is their highway to proving the Necessarily Existent." (The Words, Thirty-Third Word, Thirtieth Window). The counterpart of the preacher's words "they hand it out to causes, they divide it up": "you forgot your Lord, the Creator of all things, and attributed them to an imaginary nature; you gave His works to causes and divided that Creator's property among false objects of worship, the idols." (The Flashes, Seventeenth Flash, Fifth Note).

📖 Source note · The proof of hudus

The saying "The inability to comprehend is comprehension" is not a hadith. It is attributed to Abu Bakr in works of Qur'anic commentary and Sufism (al-Razi, al-Alusi, al-Ghazali, Ibn Arabi); it could not be found in a primary source.

X — The Attribute of eternity, the Name "the First"

Allah existed, and nothing else existed

After hudus comes the matter of eternity: "eternity means having no beginning." Allah's Name "the First" rests on the Attribute of eternity, and "the eternal is also everlasting." That the atom is not eternal, that it was created later, is seen with the microscope, with electron beams, with X-rays. "Only Allah existed. Nothing existed, let me say. Allah existed. Nothing existed."

If this truth enters the heart, "we give eternity, beginninglessness, to Allah, we dethrone matter," and this conclusion follows: Allah created matter. "In Jeans's words, Allah said to light, 'Be,' and light came into being." Hocaefendi says he will show this through three points: the law of heat, the motion of the electrons around the atomic nucleus, and the sun and its energy.

📋 Three proofs
1. The law of heatThermodynamics: what is hot gives its heat to its surroundings; the universe is heading toward going out.
2. The electronsThe motion of the electrons revolving around the nucleus.
3. The sunThe sun's energy and the mass it loses every second.
📖 In the Risale-i Nur · The Attribute of eternity, the Name "the First"

"Indeed, what is without beginning is surely without end. What is eternal is surely everlasting. What is Necessarily Existent is surely perpetual." (The Letters, Twentieth Letter, Eighth Phrase): the counterpart of the preacher's words "the eternal is also everlasting."

📖 Source note · The Attribute of eternity, the Name "the First"

The hadith "Allah existed, and nothing other than Him existed": Bukhari, Bad' al-Khalq. The preacher attributes the words "Allah said to light, 'Be'" to Jeans; the words occur in the Bible, in Genesis 1:3 (in Latin, fiat lux). Their counterpart in the Qur'an is the command "Be!"; in Suat Yıldırım's translation: "When He wills a thing, His command is only to say to it 'Be!', and it at once comes to be..." (Ya-Sin 36:82).

XI — The first proof: the law of heat

Every originated thing has an Originator

"According to this law, matter was created later." "A thing does not come into being by itself from nothing." The old theologian used to say from his chair: "Everything in the universe is originated. It came to be later. For every originated thing there is an Originator." So the universe is originated, and its Originator is Allah. "But is the universe truly originated?" One name for this law is Carnot's law; its technical name is the second law of thermodynamics. Through Hubble's observation it was seen that the nebulae are fleeing and the universe is expanding; it was understood that some suns were going out and becoming dwarfs. "Today this law is taught in universities as an established, positive law." Eddington, and Jeans in his "Mysterious Universe," are great defenders of this law; "Einstein's account of the universe also tends to confirm this law."

Hocaefendi explains the law in popular terms: "Take an object and boil it, heat it in fire, in water. When it has become a piece of fire, then plunge it into cold water." The heat at the center rushes toward the cold surroundings, and the surroundings become hot to the same level. The universe is full of suns: "Within the Milky Way there are millions of suns like our sun." In the past it was said that there are fifteen million degrees of heat at the center of the sun; some researchers say one hundred forty million degrees. This heat goes out from the center, is scattered around as radiation, and this continues until the surroundings reach the same temperature.

📋 The theologian's syllogism
Minor premiseEverything in the universe is originated; it came to be later.
Major premiseEvery originated thing has an Originator who brings it about.
ConclusionThe universe has an Originator: Allah.
🔬 Scientific explanation · The first proof: the law of heat

According to the second law of thermodynamics, disorder (entropy) in a closed system does not decrease by itself; heat flows from hot to cold, and in the end everything reaches the same temperature. The law goes back to Sadi Carnot's work of 1824, and the concept of entropy to Rudolf Clausius (1850s-1865). That the universe is expanding was established by Edwin Hubble's observations of 1929. Arthur Eddington, in "The Nature of the Physical World" (1928), describes this law as "the arrow of time"; James Jeans, in "The Mysterious Universe" (1930), writes that the universe is heading toward heat death. The preacher's remark that suns are "becoming dwarfs" refers to stars that have run out of fuel turning into white dwarfs.

🔬 1975 → today · The first proof: the law of heat

The temperature at the center of the sun is given today as about 15 million degrees (the value the preacher calls "in the past"). The Milky Way contains about 100-400 billion stars; the observable universe contains hundreds of billions of galaxies.

📖 In the Risale-i Nur · The first proof: the law of heat

The theologian's syllogism appears in The Supreme Sign as the theologians' truth of "hudus and contingency": "Since there is change and alteration in the world and in all things, they are surely transient and originated; they cannot be eternal. And since they are originated, there is surely a Maker who brought them into being." (The Rays, Seventh Ray: The Supreme Sign).

XII — Heat balance and beginningless eternity

Had matter been without beginning, it would long since have gone out

"What if it radiates heat?" This is happening throughout the universe, in all the nebulae. One day every place will be filled with energy to the same degree, and no plus and minus will be left in the universe: "In the old language, zaid and naqis, plus and minus, will vanish." There will be a potential energy, "But there will be no life. Life arises from opposite poles facing one another." The suns will stop, the stars will go out, the moon will fall, the earth will shrivel, scorch and go out.

Its connection with Allah's being eternal is this: the believer calls Allah "without beginning"; beginningless eternity is not a billion or a trillion years: "It means infinite time." Whoever says matter is eternal is giving the believer's judgment about Allah to the atom and to energy. Yet "the law of thermodynamics does not allow matter to be without beginning": "If it were without beginning, by now, a million times millions of years ago, the law of thermodynamics would long since have run its course." "At this very moment, the existence of the universe, the existence of the earth, the existence of life, in the face of this law, shows that matter was created later. The One without beginning is Allah."

📋 The reasoning
The lawMatter always gives off the heat at its center to the outside.
Had it been without beginningHeat balance would long since have been reached, and everything would have gone out.
ObservationThe universe, the earth and life exist.
ConclusionMatter was created later; the One without beginning is Allah.
🔬 Scientific explanation · Heat balance and beginningless eternity

In present-day cosmology, the accelerating expansion of the universe was discovered in 1998. Accordingly, the most likely end is a cold, dark universe in which the stars have gone out and temperature differences have vanished ("heat death" or "the Big Freeze"). The end the preacher describes (the suns stopping, the stars going out, life becoming impossible) accords with this scenario.

🧩 Logical review · Heat balance and beginningless eternity

The form of the reasoning is sound: if a process moves in one direction and its end lies at a finite distance, an infinite past would require that end to have been reached long ago; since it has not been reached, the past is not infinite. The proof rests on two conditions: that the universe as a whole is subject to this law, and that it receives no unlimited energy from outside. Some physicists have proposed models with an infinite past; but the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem (2003) shows that a universe that is expanding on average must have a boundary in the past (see the alternative proofs in section XVI).

📖 In the Risale-i Nur · Heat balance and beginningless eternity

"Moreover, beginningless eternity is not one end of the chain of the past, such that it could be taken as the basis for the existence of things and some necessity conceived accordingly. Rather, beginningless eternity is like a mirror that holds past, present and future all at once and looks on them from on high." (The Words, Twenty-Sixth Word, Second Topic): in the same direction as the preacher's words "Eternity means timelessness."

XIII — The second proof: the atom and the electrons

The electrons were either at rest or moving

"You and I, the whole universe, this lectern, the pulpit over there, the walls of the mosque, are made of the same stones of Allah." These stones are so small that if you shrank a millimeter by a fraction with twenty zeros, it might perhaps match the diameter of the atom. "The ancients called it 'the indivisible part.'" In the nucleus of the atom there are protons and neutrons; around it revolve electrons, making turns of what "the Arabs called 'ihlilaj'," turns that can take the shape of a pine cone. The preacher takes the hydrogen atom as an example: at its center, like a sun, one proton and one neutron.

"A thing either moves or is at rest. There is no third alternative." Had the electrons been at rest, the positively charged nucleus would have pulled them in: "If every atom's electron were pulled in by its nucleus, the earth would be the size of an egg"; the same weight, but the size of an egg. Neither you nor life would exist. So the electrons are moving. But: "If these electrons had been revolving around the nucleus from beginningless eternity, they would long ago have reached the place they are now heading toward." "So they have a beginning." Of this beginning "we say: Allah said to the atom 'Be,' and the atom came into being."

📋 Two alternatives
At restThe nucleus would pull the electron in; the earth would be the size of an egg.
MovingHad it been revolving from beginningless eternity, it would long ago have reached its destination.
ConclusionThe atom and the electron have a beginning.
🔬 Scientific explanation · The second proof: the atom and the electrons

In the present-day model of the atom, the nucleus consists of protons and neutrons; the number of protons determines the element (hydrogen 1, uranium 92). Electrons do not revolve in a fixed orbit like planets; they are found in "orbitals," the distributions of the probability of their being found around the nucleus. The preacher's comparison to an "ihlilaj" (ellipse) and a "pine cone" reflects the atomic diagrams common in that period (the Bohr-Sommerfeld model). It was also understood later that the atom, whose name means "the indivisible part," can be divided (the nucleus in 1911, the neutron in 1932).

🔬 1975 → today · The second proof: the atom and the electrons

The diameter of the atom is about 0.1-0.5 nanometers, that is, on the order of a ten-millionth of a millimeter; the nucleus is about a hundred thousand times smaller. Uranium-238, one of the heaviest known natural nuclei, has 238 particles (92 protons, 146 neutrons). If the entire mass of the earth were compressed to the density of the atomic nucleus, it would be a sphere about 370 meters across; the preacher's "egg" simile is meant to make this shrinking imaginable.

✏️ A note in light of current knowledge · The second proof: the atom and the electrons

The nucleus of the ordinary hydrogen atom contains only one proton and no neutron. A nucleus with one proton and one neutron belongs to deuterium, the heavy form of hydrogen (about one in 6,400 hydrogen atoms in nature).

🧩 Logical review · The second proof: the atom and the electrons

According to classical physics, a revolving electron should radiate, lose energy and fall into the nucleus; this was the well-known problem of the Rutherford model. Quantum mechanics shows that the atom is stable: an electron at the lowest energy level does not lose energy, and the atom does not "run down" on its own. That is why the judgment that electrons revolving from beginningless eternity would long since have been used up draws its strength today not from the electron's own motion but from the first proof, thermodynamics, and from radioactive decay (see the alternative proofs in section XVI, 2). The conclusion the preacher reaches (matter is not without beginning) stands on these proofs.

🧭 Evidence and faith · The second proof: the atom and the electrons

These notes concern not the speaker's conclusion but the 1975 knowledge on which the example rested. Science is open to change, a shifting ground; what is accepted as true today may be corrected tomorrow. A change in a scientific finding therefore does not touch the foundation of faith; precisely because science stands ready to change, it is not the ground of belief but a means of reading the truth. This is the answer to the question, "If the evidence collapses, does faith collapse too?": faith rests not on the knowledge of a given era but on the truth to which that knowledge points. The speaker used these examples in the language of ordinary people, so that they would come alive in the listener's mind; even if the figures and details change, the essence he meant to convey remains intact: matter is not eternal, and only Allah is without beginning.

XIV — The third proof: the sun and the Self-Subsisting Sustainer

A hearth of Allah, a lamp of Allah, a stove of Allah

"The sun is a magnificent hearth of Allah, a lamp of Allah, a stove of Allah, vast enough to contain a million earths." Its diameter is one hundred nine times that of the earth. Every second five hundred sixty-four million tons of hydrogen turn into helium, and every second the sun loses four million tons of its mass: two hundred forty million tons a minute, fourteen billion four hundred million tons an hour. From its mass the sun sends you energy and radiation; by it the grass grows, the young grow, the fruit turns sweet. "If the sun did not come, if it had no light, you would be finished."

Whoever says matter is without beginning is saying that these have no beginning. Yet "if these suns had no beginning, they would long since have come to an end by now." As the preacher relates it, even Einstein, unable to solve this riddle, says of the sun in his book titled "The Universe": "It feeds from somewhere like a parasite." Hocaefendi's answer: "The sun rests on Allah's Name the Self-Subsisting Sustainer; that is where it feeds from. Otherwise, by now it would long since have gone out." Neither the sun, nor the earth, nor energy, nor matter is eternal: "The One eternal, without beginning and without end, is Allah." The preacher also has the listeners do a calculation: even if the sun were the size of a million earths and lost perhaps several earths' worth a year, "after a million years the sun would simply come to an end."

📋 The preacher's figures
SizeDiameter 109 times the earth's; a million earths fit inside.
Burning564 million tons of hydrogen turn into helium every second.
Mass loss4 million tons a second; 240 million a minute; 14.4 billion tons an hour.
SupportThe sun rests on Allah's Name the Self-Subsisting Sustainer; that is where it feeds from.
🔬 Scientific explanation · The third proof: the sun and the Self-Subsisting Sustainer

At the center of the sun, hydrogen nuclei fuse into helium (fusion). The resulting helium is about seven parts in a thousand lighter than the hydrogen that formed it; the difference turns into energy according to Einstein's relation E=mc² and is radiated as light. This is the mass loss the preacher describes. The sun's source of energy was understood in 1938-39 through the work of Hans Bethe.

🔬 1975 → today · The third proof: the sun and the Self-Subsisting Sustainer

The sun's diameter is about 109 times that of the earth; about 1.3 million earths would fit in its volume. About 600 million tons of hydrogen turn into helium every second, and the sun loses about 4.3 million tons of mass per second. At this rate it loses one earth's mass in about 44 million years. The sun is about 4.6 billion years old; the total time it will live by burning hydrogen is about 10 billion years. Though the figures differ, the preacher's judgment (the sun is neither without beginning nor without end) holds with present-day knowledge as well.

📖 In the Risale-i Nur · The third proof: the sun and the Self-Subsisting Sustainer

That the sun is a "lamp and stove" is the Risale-i Nur's expression: "for our sun, which is more than a million times larger than the earth, which lives more than a million years, and which is a lamp and a stove in a guesthouse of the All-Merciful, to keep burning without going out, it would need every day as much kerosene as the earth's seas, as much coal as its mountains, or heaps of firewood as large as a thousand earths." (The Words, Thirteenth Word, Addendum to the Second Station). The Name Self-Subsisting: "If this point of support did not exist, nothing could stand by itself; it would roll through an infinite void and fall into nonexistence." and "all beings, with regard to their existence, their standing and their continuance, lean on the Self-Subsisting One of Majesty; their standing is through Him." (The Flashes, Thirtieth Flash, the Name Self-Subsisting, Second Ray).

📖 Source note · The third proof: the sun and the Self-Subsisting Sustainer

Einstein wrote no book titled "The Universe." What the preacher means is probably Lincoln Barnett's "The Universe and Dr. Einstein" (1948; in Turkish "Evren ve Einstein"). The "like a parasite" simile could not be found in the archive.

XV — A skull two and a half million years old

The sun is kept fit for life

Hocaefendi relates that "in one of the latest issues of Bilim ve Teknik" a skull said to belong to a human who lived two and a half million years ago was reported, and he draws two conclusions from it. The first: "even the oldest monkey skulls in the world do not go beyond one, one and a half million years"; that a human skull is found from before the monkey is "a proof that Darwin's fallacy has no place." The second: "two and a half million years ago the sun was in a state suitable for a living being to live on earth."

Since the sun loses this much every day, there should be a great difference between the sun of two and a half million years ago and the sun of today; one day the sun will open like an umbrella, then contract and become a dwarf star. "When they put the star Sirius, twenty times larger than the sun, in the sun's place, they say everything would melt, turn to vapor and vanish." A living being burns at a hundred degrees of heat and freezes at a hundred degrees of cold: "So it has not changed by even a hundred degrees." "Both of these states show that the sun is not without beginning. The sun is not without end." The preacher recalls the verse of subjection in paraphrase: Allah has made the earth, the suns and the stars subservient to your command, "So that you too may be subservient to His command."

📋 Two conclusions from the skull
FirstThe human skull is older than the monkey skulls: a proof against Darwin's claim (as the preacher relates it).
SecondTwo and a half million years ago, too, the sun was fit for life; it is Allah who keeps it in balance.
✏️ A note in light of current knowledge · A skull two and a half million years old

A note in light of the knowledge of the period: the preacher is speaking in 1975, relying on the publications of the day. The skull he means is most likely KNM-ER 1470, found by Richard Leakey in Kenya in 1972; its first dating was about 2.6-2.9 million years, later revised by subsequent measurements to about 1.9 million years. The claim that the oldest monkey skulls do not go beyond 1-1.5 million years is also no longer valid; primate fossils reach back tens of millions of years. This part is not a basis for the main proof of the sermon, the proof of hudus; it reflects the knowledge of the preacher's time.

🔬 1975 → today · A skull two and a half million years old

Sirius A is about 2 times heavier than the sun, its radius is about 1.7 times larger, and it is about 25 times brighter; for brightness, "twenty times" is a close value. The sun's brightness increases by one percent in about 100 million years.

🧩 Logical review · A skull two and a half million years old

The judgment the preacher reaches (the sun is neither without beginning nor without end) holds with present-day knowledge as well; the road to it is calculated differently today. In two and a half million years the sun loses only about one six-millionth of its mass, and in that time its brightness increases by only a quarter of a thousandth; that is, over this period the sun has stayed almost the same. The point that really deserves attention is that the sun has burned within a narrow range fit for life for billions of years (see the alternative proofs in section XVI, 3: the "faint young sun").

📖 Source note · A skull two and a half million years old

For the verses of subjection, see Ibrahim 14:32-33 and Al-Jathiyah 45:13. In Suat Yıldırım's translation: "It is He who has made the Sun and the Moon, which run their regular courses, available to you, and has put the night and the day at your service." (Ibrahim 14:33). The report the preacher mentions comes from the magazine Bilim ve Teknik (TÜBİTAK).

🧭 Evidence and faith · A skull two and a half million years old

These notes concern not the speaker's conclusion but the 1975 knowledge on which the example rested. Science is open to change, a shifting ground; what is accepted as true today may be corrected tomorrow. A change in a scientific finding therefore does not touch the foundation of faith; precisely because science stands ready to change, it is not the ground of belief but a means of reading the truth. This is the answer to the question, "If the evidence collapses, does faith collapse too?": faith rests not on the knowledge of a given era but on the truth to which that knowledge points. The speaker used these examples in the language of ordinary people, so that they would come alive in the listener's mind; even if the figures and details change, the essence he meant to convey remains intact: matter is not eternal, and only Allah is without beginning.

XVI — Substance and accident; summary

An accident subsists through matter

The materialist's objection is this: "There was no atom, but there was energy. Energy turned into the atom. In the end the atom too will turn into energy." Hocaefendi's answer: "Perhaps there truly is such a transformation. But this is by Allah's might and power"; la hawla wa la quwwata illa billah. "It is Allah who makes the atom energy and energy the atom." The second gap: "Energy subsists through matter." If there were no body, there would be nothing to feel the existence of the heat. "The ancients put it this way: energy, force, is an accident. Matter is a substance. An accident subsists through matter." So "to think of energy as the beginning of the universe is, again, an expression of falling into contradiction with scientific facts."

In summary: "With this lesson we looked at the secret of the universe's coming-into-being." Even if matters are traced back in a chain to the most ancient times, unless they rest on Allah no matter can be explained in the light of logic and science: "Allah said to the atom 'Be,' or to light 'Be,' and light came into being; the solution of the riddle lies within these two sentences." Hocaefendi prays: just as Allah said "I am" behind thermodynamics, behind the sun's energy, and behind the motion of the electrons, may He also say "I am" to our selves, and bring our hearts to inner peace.

📋 Substance and accident
SubstanceMatter; that which occupies space by itself.
AccidentEnergy, force, heat; that which subsists through a substance.
ConclusionTo place energy alone at the beginning of the universe contradicts science.
🔬 Scientific explanation · Substance and accident; summary

Einstein's relation E=mc² (1905) shows that matter and energy can turn into one another: in particle accelerators, particle-antiparticle pairs form from energy; when matter and antimatter meet, they turn into energy. The preacher accepts this transformation; his objection is to the claim that the transformation runs by itself.

🧩 Logical review · Substance and accident; summary

Light travels through empty space without matter; light leaving the sun reaches the earth in about eight minutes without touching any body on the way. The preacher's sentence concerns sensing: for heat to be felt, it must reach a body. The statement that comes closer today to the kalam judgment that an accident cannot subsist without a substance is this: energy is not something that stands by itself but a property of fields and particles (see the alternative proofs below, 4).

🧭 Alternative proofs (from present-day science) · Substance and accident; summary

Keeping the structure of the preacher's proofs, with observations regarded as sound in present-day science:

1. The universe has a beginning. The universe is expanding (Hubble-Lemaître, 1929); going back in time, everything gathers at a beginning. The trace of that beginning is still measured today: the cosmic microwave background radiation, at a temperature of about 2.7 K, coming from every part of the sky. The Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem (2003) shows that every model of a universe expanding on average must have a boundary in the past. The universe is also slowing its production of stars: the most intense period was about 10 billion years ago. The universe is truly heading "toward going out," and this is observed directly.

2. The radioactive hourglass. Uranium-235 decays at a constant rate (half-life about 700 million years). Had matter been without beginning, not a single atom of uranium-235 would be left on earth; yet it still exists. So matter has a beginning, and this beginning can be measured (the earth is about 4.5 billion years old). This is the clearest present-day example of the preacher's judgment that begins "If matter were without beginning."

3. The fuel that has not run out: hydrogen. About three quarters of the ordinary matter in the universe is still hydrogen; stars keep turning it into helium. Had the universe been without beginning, this fuel would long since have run out. The sun too is about 4.6 billion years old and has a lifespan of about 10 billion years: neither without beginning nor without end. Four billion years ago the sun was about 30% fainter than today; even so, the earth remained fit for life (the "faint young sun" problem).

4. "Nothingness" and the laws. In present-day physics, energy is not something that stands by itself but a property of fields (close to the preacher's words "An accident subsists through matter"). The "nothingness" meant by those who say "the universe came into being from nothing by itself" is, in physics, the quantum vacuum, which has laws and fields; that is, it is not nothingness. The real question is where those laws themselves come from.

5. Necessary and contingent. The examples of the book, the preacher and the train are still valid today; they rest not on a scientific finding but on reasoning. The kalam distinction between the necessary and the contingent (Ibn Sina, al-Ghazali) and Leibniz's question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" arrive at the same place: the chain of things whose existence depends on another ends in a being whose existence is from itself.

6. Measure (fine-tuning). Values such as gravity, the nuclear forces and the cosmological constant lie within a very narrow range; were they slightly different, there would be no stars, no carbon and no life. This is offered not as a conclusive proof but as a sign to reflect on; it is also debated in the scientific world.

📖 Source note · Substance and accident; summary

La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah (there is no might nor power except with Allah): Bukhari, Muslim; in the hadith it is called "a treasure from the treasures of Paradise."

XVII — "Who created Allah?"

Seek refuge in Allah, say la hawla

"There is one more fallacy." The Messenger of Allah foretells this truth: one day someone will lie back at ease or cross his legs, one foot over the other, and say: "Allah created this, Allah created that, Allah created this; who created Allah?" they will say. According to Hocaefendi, this is the foretelling of an event to come: of an age in which the heretics will rule, atheism will prevail, Satan will set up his dominion, and some devils in human form will become subjects of that dominion.

The Prophet's remedy: when you come to that state, say la hawla wa la quwwata illa billah and seek refuge in Allah. "All the might and power in the universe subsist through Allah. What you call energy subsists through Allah." The preacher characterizes the use of these words in his own time this way: "The words 'Who, Allah forbid, created Allah?' are words the communists made up." Because they cannot deny Allah's existence in the face of thousands of proofs, they take refuge in this objection.

🧩 Logical review · "Who created Allah?"

The question applies the principle that everything created has a creator to what is uncreated. The principle the proof rests on, however, is the theologian's sentence "For every originated thing there is an Originator" (section XI): not everything, but what comes to be later has something that brings it about. To ask for the beginning of what has no beginning means the question contradicts itself. The preacher's subsequent examples show this point.

📖 Source note · "Who created Allah?"

Hadith: the advice to seek refuge in Allah and say la hawla to those who ask "Who created Allah?" (Bukhari, Muslim). The preacher's picture of one who "will cross his legs, one foot over the other" recalls another hadith (the hadith of the couch, on rejecting the Sunnah); the two narrations may have merged. The characterization "words the communists made up" is the preacher's own interpretation; in the hadith, it is the question itself that is foretold.

XVIII — The book, the preacher, the feet and the train

Contingency ends, necessity begins

The example of the book: if you saw a book on the lectern and a little later saw it somewhere else, you would say, "there is someone who took this book from here and put it here"; because a book cannot change its place by itself, and to attribute this to the book "means to imagine will, power, and knowledge in it." The example of the preacher: if you saw Hocaefendi first at the lectern and then in front of the pulpit, you would not find it strange: "You would say, 'He had a will. He was a mover by himself, one who moves.'" The example of the feet: the head moves about on the body, the body on the feet; asked what moves the feet, you would say, "The feet move by themselves." The example of the train: the last wagon is pulled by the one before it, and that one by the one before it; "You can make it a million wagons." Assurance forms in the heart when the matter rests on "one that moves itself by itself."

"We are explaining that things cannot subsist by themselves." "We said that behind them there is One who is not like them. That is, there is One who does not transform like the atom, who does not go out like the sun." "But this is so until you rest it on one that moves by itself; but when you come to the One who moves by Himself, there everything has ended." To rank Allah among creatures is not to know Him: "If you think that He too was created by someone, then whoever created Him, that one is Allah, may His glory be exalted." "Where will creation's chain end? There you'll say: contingency ends, necessity begins." The last words of the sermon: "So there is a Being who is eternal. So there is a Being who is without beginning. Everything other than Him is originated and will later perish too."

📋 Four examples
The bookIt cannot change its place by itself; there is someone who carries it.
The preacherHe moves himself by his own will; no other carrier is sought.
The feetThe head rests on the body, the body on the feet; the chain stops somewhere.
The trainEven if the wagons number a million, the chain ends when it rests on the one that pulls itself.
🧩 Logical review · The book, the preacher, the feet and the train

The common logic of the examples is this: a chain of things whose motion comes from another, however far it is extended, is not explained unless it rests on something whose motion is from itself (the train wagons). The book stands for what depends on another, the preacher for what moves by its own will. The preacher in the examples is also a created being; the example only shows the form of the reasoning. In the language of kalam: the chain of things whose existence depends on another (the contingent) ends in a being whose existence is from itself (the necessary). The preacher's words "contingency ends, necessity begins" sum up this distinction.

📖 In the Risale-i Nur · The book, the preacher, the feet and the train

As the saying of the theologians: "For contingent beings cannot bring one another into being in an infinite regress. Nor can it be in the form of a circle, this one creating that and that one creating this. So there is a Necessarily Existent Being who brings them into being" (The Words, Thirty-Third Word, Thirtieth Window). In The Supreme Sign: "surely there must exist a Necessarily Existent Being whose like is impossible, whose equal is inconceivable, and all other than whom are contingent and all besides whom are His creatures." (The Rays, Seventh Ray). The preacher's words "contingency ends, necessity begins" are a short expression of this judgment.

🤲 The prayer at the end of the sermon (not included in the video)

After the summary of the lesson, Hocaefendi closes with this prayer: "May Allah instill the beginninglessness of that Being without beginning into the hearts of our generation, which has been led astray into misguidance and driven into unbelief. May He grant fairness to those who lead it astray here and there. As for the atheists and deniers who have lost their right to be worthy of fairness, may Allah subdue and destroy them as soon as possible."

The prayer is completed with the recitation of Al-Fatiha.

XIX — How the video was made

Original audio, visuals drawn in code

The audio is the original recording of the sermon, dated February 21, 1975 (Çınar Media); it has not been altered. The opening prayers at the start of the recording (including An-Nur 24:35) and the closing prayer at the end are not included in the video; they are given in expandable boxes in this post. In the subtitles of the Arabic recitations, the surah and verse number are given in parentheses.

The visuals, which move in step with the speech, were prepared in code with artificial intelligence (Anthropic Claude). The "Note" boxes in the video are not the preacher's words; they are notes on sources and current information. The expandable boxes in this post (scientific explanation, 1975 → today, correction, logical review, alternative proofs, Risale-i Nur parallels, source note) are not the preacher's words either.

📋 In the video
AudioThe original recording of February 21, 1975; not an AI voiceover.
VisualsAnimated slides prepared in code with artificial intelligence.
Note boxesNotes on sources and current information; not the preacher's words.
SubtitlesTurkish, English, French, German, Spanish, Russian, Hindi.

Concepts

📖 Concepts in the sermon

Hudus: Coming into existence later; coming-into-being.

Hâdis / muhdis: What is originated, what comes to be later / the Originator who brings it about.

Kıdem: Eternity: having no beginning; being without beginning.

Evvel: The First: the Name of Allah declaring that He is before all things and has no beginning.

Ezel: Beginningless eternity: that which has no beginning; in the preacher's words, infinite time, timelessness.

Kayyûm: The Self-Subsisting Sustainer: the One who keeps everything in existence and holds it up at every moment.

Cevher / araz: Substance / accident: what occupies space by itself (matter) / what exists dependent on it (color, heat, force).

Teselsül: Infinite regress: causes linking one to another without end.

İmkân / vücub: Contingency / necessity: having one's existence depend on another / having one's existence from oneself.

Âfâk / enfüs: The horizons / the self: the outer world (the universe) / the inner world (the human being himself).

Sources

📖 Sources of the sermon

Audio recording: Çınar Media (YouTube)

Verses: An-Nur 24:35 · Al-A'raf 7:146 · Al-Baqarah 2:258 · Az-Zumar 39:3 · Al 'Imran 3:190-191 · Yusuf 12:105 · Al-Hijr 15:12-13 · Al-Mutaffifin 83:14 · Adh-Dhariyat 51:20-23 · Al-'Ankabut 29:51 · An-Nisa 4:165 · Muhammad 47:24 · Ibrahim 14:32-33 (translations: Suat Yıldırım)

Hadiths: "Who created Allah?" (Bukhari, Muslim) · "Allah existed, and nothing other than Him existed" (Bukhari) · La hawla wa la quwwata illa billah (Bukhari, Muslim)

Risale-i Nur: The Words (addendum to the Thirteenth Word, Nineteenth Word, Twenty-Fifth Word, Twenty-Sixth Word, Thirty-Third Word) · The Flashes (Second, Seventeenth and Thirtieth Flashes) · The Letters (Nineteenth and Twentieth Letters) · The Rays (Seventh Ray: The Supreme Sign)

Scientific references: E. Hubble (1929) · A. Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World (1928) · J. Jeans, The Mysterious Universe (1930) · L. Barnett, The Universe and Dr. Einstein (1948; "Evren ve Einstein") · R. Leakey, KNM-ER 1470 (1972) · Bilim ve Teknik magazine

The audio is the original recording of the sermon, not an AI voiceover. The opening prayers at the start of the recording and the closing prayer at the end are not included in the video; they are given in boxes in this post. The visuals were prepared in code with the help of artificial intelligence. The verse translations are from Suat Yıldırım. The scientific explanations, corrections, logical reviews, alternative proofs, Risale-i Nur parallels, and source notes in the expandable boxes are not the preacher's words.
Series
Loading…